Ana Escribano's reflection:
The first
thing this group did was showing and explaining the team plan with tables. They
talked about micro-tasks, responsibilities and commitments like the rest of the
groups. I liked that they also included a table about what they had learned
doing this project.
The subject
the chose to develop was Science, aimed at 3rd and 4th
grade students. The specific topic was the plants’ classification.
They used
the “Jigsaw” technique and, in general, I would say that the sessions and
respective contents were relevant and well thought. In order to complete the
work they had to go on a trip to the Botanical Garden, which I found
interesting.
The only
thing I found a little confusing is the task assigned to the expert groups.
They specialized in one aspect of the plant and, apparently, had to work
together during the trip. However, the teacher had told the characteristics of
a tree they had to find to the base group. Each base group had to look for a
different tree, but they were not together exchanging information and telling
each other what they had learned. It was after the trip when the base groups
got together again and share their knowledge. In my opinion, there should have
been time assigned before the visit to the Botanical Garden to work in the base
groups since the objective should be learning about all the characteristics of
a certain tree, not just your expert area.
Finally, it
was a good idea to give certificates to all the participants and hand out
prizes rewarding different skills and the work done in different areas, so that
every group has one award and do not feel left out.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario